the treaty was signed 50 years ago and was completely different than the national environment. five countries have decided they have rights to have this weapon and others do not. at that time there were able -- the soviet union was able to do liver to the u.s., to guarantee that this would be respected. completely different. we have several countries that abstained already. do you think it is still possible to stop any country -- to deny rights to have this weapon now since, only by force it does not work you and the moral base is nonexistent. all, i would make a couple of points. i certainly think russia and the united states agree that a world where more countries have nuclear weapons is a more dangerous world. i would argue the proliferation of nuclear weapons make its -- makes it a more dangerous world. for a world in which bad actors can get access to nuclear material that is not adequately safeguarded. indicated,y, as you those countries put in place the mpg and form that they did. it does not give you a right to enrich -- clearly it does provide a vehicle for the peacefu